Showing posts with label Political System. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Political System. Show all posts

Saturday, February 18, 2012

What Chinese People Really Think and Feel

This is about 'political sarcasm'  found on the Internet in China.
Chinascope has translated some Internet and blog postings about today's China.
One is surprised at the candidness of the bloggers ...and their courage.
Of course, most of the issues raised exist elsewhere in the world and particularly in India, but here we have a relatively free Press which allows the 'masses' to record their frustrations, their anger and the excesses  of the politicians and the civil servants (the formers usually take a beating during the next round of elections as the result of scams' coverage).
It is not yet the case in China which does not know elections.
I had already mentioned on this blog  the funny case of: "The Château Lafite Rothschild that you drank was created on a ship."
Let us hope that the Indian Government will not put its threats of censuring social networks into practice, it would be loss for the society.
Though the people would certainly find a way to circumvent any censure. 
It is not that easy to muzzle the truth in China and elsewhere.  
It gives hope that we shall, one day, live in a better world.

Chinascope Editor’s Note:
Political jokes and sarcasm are a good resource for understanding a country’s political realities, public attitudes, and the nature of problems that affect that society’s stability. An article titled “An Outstanding Student’s Letter to Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao,” which was published on Weibo.com, combined many of the microblog posts published throughout 2011 that exhibited China’s particular affinity for political sarcasm. Some of these postings can also be found on some official websites, such as the public forums for People’s Daily Online. This indicates that it is not just the public that understands the underlying issues; the government officials acknowledge them as well. A translation of a major part of the article follows. The Chinascope editor has added some helpful information so that Western readers may better understand the specific issues, the references, and the subtlety (although sometimes not so subtle) of Chinese humor.]

An Outstanding Student’s Letter to Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao

December 16, 2011

Dear President and Prime Minister:

Greetings!

According to government statistics, in the past 30 years of reform and opening up, the items that have appreciated in value the most were: housing, cemetery plots, officials’ hats (Ed: that the content of officials’ hats appreciates is suggestive of the large amount of money people have to pay in bribes to secure a government position), moon cakes, and mistresses. The items that have depreciated in value the fastest were: professional titles, diplomas, morals, credibility, and the Renminbi.
China has become a nation of many groups, including the no-money-left-by-the-end-of-the-month group (those who spend but don’t plan), the eat-the-elderly group (those who don’t work but live off of their parent’s income), the low-paid-worker group, the living-in-a-tiny-residence group, the ant group, the complainer group, the con artist group, the chasing-self-interest group, and the hiding-marriage group (married people who appear single in public due to workplace or social pressure, such as not being able to afford a wedding).

***

 This year, a “nail” resident (Ed: 钉子户, a new term in China referring to someone who refuses to give up his home when government officials appropriate the land in order to develop it) resorted to the most desperate solution; she ended her life (Ed: Tang Fuzhen set herself on fire). Her death did not prove the government’s barbarity and shamelessness, but only that gasoline could ignite.

***

In this year, Li Gang didn’t get famous. Li Gang’s son didn’t get famous either, but Li Gang’s son’s (words about his) dad got really famous. (Ed: Li Gang is the Deputy Director of the Beishi District Police Department, Baoding City, Hebei Province. While driving, his son hit and killed two college students. When the authorities came to get him, he infamously said, “Go ahead and sue me if you dare. My dad is Li Gang!” The sentence, “My dad is Li Gang,” has since been the subject of many sarcastic jokes on the Internet.)

***

Recently, the government issued telling statistics:
  • If you are not one of the “big three” (a big official, a big celebrity, or someone with big money), what would it cost you to buy a 100-square-meter (900-square-feet) apartment in Beijing at a price of 3 million yuan (U.S. $480,000)?
  • 1. If you are a farmer: Given an annual income of 400 yuan per Mu (0.17 acre), you would need to have farmed 3 Mus every year from the time of the Tang dynasty (618 A.D. – 907 A.D.) until now (assuming there was no disaster at any time).
  • 2. If you are a factory worker: Given a monthly income of 1,500 yuan, you would need to have worked from the time of the Opium War (1839-1842) until now (with no weekends or holidays off).
  • 3. If you are a white-collar worker: Given an annual income of 60,000 yuan, you would need to have earned the same salary since 1960, with no eating or drinking (Ed:  saving every penny) (with no days off) for holidays.
  • 4. If you are a thief: You would need to have committed the same crime 2,500 times and all of those crimes must have been against white-collar workers (Ed: Since the farmers and factory workers earn much less than white-collar workers, stealing from them would not result in much money) over about 30 years.
  • 5. If you are a prostitute: You would have had to service 10,000 customers. Assuming you serviced one customer a day, you would have had to work for 10,000 days straight, from the age of 18 to the age of 46 (with no time off for your menstrual period).
  • Expenses for such items as interior decoration, furniture, and appliances are not included for anyone above.
  • ______
China’s Current Banking Situation (this is classic):
(Ed: In China, all the major banks are state-owned. Therefore, when there is a conflict between the bank and the customer, the government sides with the bank)
  • 1. The customer receives counterfeit money from an ATM machine.  That has nothing to do with the bank.
  • 2. The customer loses money when his online banking account is hacked. That is the customer’s problem.
  • 3. The bank gives too much money to the customer.  The customer must return it.
  • 4. The bank gives too little money to the customer. The bank is no longer responsible once (the customer) leaves the counter.
  • 5. The customer receives less money due to an ATM problem. That’s the customer’s problem.
  • 6. The customer receives too much money due to an ATM problem. The customer is stealing.
  • 7. The President of Kaiping Bank, Guangdong Province, stole 400 million yuan (U.S. $63.5 million). He was sentenced to 2 years in prison.
  • 8. Xu Ting, an ordinary person received an additional 70,000 yuan (U.S. $11,000) due to an ATM error. He was sentenced to life in prison.
***

China’s Current Situation:
  • You can’t afford to have a baby – a C-section starts at 5,000 yuan.
  • You can’t afford to go to school – choosing a school starts at 30,000 yuan.
  • You can’t afford to have a residence – an apartment starts at over 20,000 yuan per square meter.
  • It’s not that you can’t find a woman to marry, but without an apartment and a car, who will marry you?
  • You can’t afford to support your family – your parents were laid off and you had a baby.
  • You can’t afford to be sick – the charge for medicine is ten times the cost of producing it; it is too expensive.
  • You can’t afford to live – if you work hard for a month, you only earn a little over 1,000 yuan.
  • You can’t afford to die – cremation and burial costs 30,000 yuan or more.
In conclusion: You can’t afford to live, nor can you afford to die.



***

  • China’s Education System: Hope goes in, desperation comes out.
  • Real estate: A tiny apartment goes in, a huge mortgage comes out.
  • Performing arts: A virgin goes in, a prostitute comes out.
  • The appeals office: Dou’e (Ed: 窦娥, the female protagonist in a well-known Chinese drama – some crooks set her up and an official sentenced her to death) goes in, an insane person comes out.
  • The government: Hai Rui (Ed: 海瑞, an honest official from the Ming Dynasty who refused to become corrupt) goes in; He Shen (Ed: 和绅, a very corrupt official from the Ming Dynasty) comes out.
  • A coal mine: Squat to go in; lay on your back (Ed: meaning you are dead) to come out.
  • University: A beautiful girl goes in; a prostitute comes out.
  • The stock market: Yang Baiwan (Ed: a rich person worth over 1 million yuan) goes in, Yang Bailao (Ed: 杨白劳, a poor peasant in a CCP drama in which the landlord took away his daughter because he was not able to pay back his debt to the landlord) comes out.
  • A BMW goes in, a bicycle comes out.
  • Suits go in, underwear comes out.

***

An ordinary person might think, “Why can’t I outwit the government?” Here are the reasons:
  • If you reason with it, it acts like a villain.
  • If you act like a villain, it talks to you about following the law.
  • If you talk to it about following the law, it talks to you about politics.
  • If you talk to it about politics, it talks to you about the unique national situation.
  • If you talk to it about the unique national situation, it talks to you about catching up with international standards.
  • If you talk to it about catching up international standards, it talks to you about culture (which is different from nation to nation).
  • If you talk to it about culture, it talks to you about Confucius.
  • If you talk to it about Confucius, it talks to you about the Big Me (Ed: what a person calls himself when bullying others).
  • If you talk to it about the Big Me, it pretends to be a pitiful small man!

***

  • (Poisoned) milk powder destroyed the 2000s generation (those born in the first decade of 2000);
  • Exams destroyed the 90s; (Ed: Endless exams for students)
  • Housing prices destroyed the 80s; (Ed: The people who started working then can’t afford housing.)
  • Unemployment destroyed the 70s; (Ed: People in their 40s have been laid off.)
  • Urban management staff destroyed the 60s; (Ed: Urban management, or 城管, the government staff that manages street order and minor local crimes. [7] It means that the government forced people in their 50s into retiring from their jobs and then would not allow them to set up vendor booths on the street in order to make a living.)
  • Forced retirement destroyed the 50s;
  • Forced-demolition destroyed the 40s;
  • Medical insurance reform destroyed the 30s. (Ed: In the past, the work place guaranteed people medical insurance. In the past few years, China made a series of medical reforms to off-load the burden from state-owned enterprises onto the Bureau of Civil Affairs. As a result, some people lost their insurance or ended up with limited or greatly reduced coverage. The elderly were hit the hardest on this issue.)


***

People who are living and living very well attended the two Conferences (Ed: 两会, the National People's Congress and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. These two Chinese characters used can also be interpreted as “know two things”).
Someone asked, “What is ‘knowing two things’?”
  • A farmer representative replied, “Knowing how to raise a pig and how to mate.”
  • A worker representative replied, “Knowing how to earn money and how to spend money.”
  • An off-farm worker representative replied, “Knowing how to get the withheld money (Ed: It’s a common practice in China for businesses to withhold off-farm workers’ wages) and how to kneel (Ed: Some off-farm workers have no choice but to kneel to beg the business owners to give them their money).”
  • A sleep-in housemaid representative replied, “Knowing how to sleep with the male master and how to make the bed.”
  • A performer representative replied, “Knowing how to create publicity and how to sleep with (the big names or the rich people).”
  • A businessman representative replied, “Knowing how to make money and how to avoid paying taxes.”
  • An official representative replied, “Knowing how to lie and how to accept bribes.”
  • An investor representative replied, “Knowing how to sell at loss and how to cry.”

***

When Gao Xiaosong (Ed: A Chinese musician who was put in prison for six months in 2011 for drunk driving) got out of prison, he wrote on his personal microblog, “November 8, the beginning of winter, my term (in prison) is over,; I am returning home. 184 days, the longest 6 months. How is every one? How is the outside world?”

Replies:
“Teacher Xiaosong, in the past 6 months:
Laden was killed;
  • Gaddafi also died;
  • The State Administration of Radio, Film and Television restricted entertainment:
  • Pan Currency was issued; (Ed: Pan Currency, or 潘币, is a unit for measuring the price of housing, suggested by Pan Shiyi, the Chairman of Soho China. 1 Pan equals 1,000 yuan per square meter. Pan Shiyi later introduced Pan Currency on his microblog using his face to replace Mao Zedong’s face on the Renminbi.)
  • The urban management staff was still mighty;
  • The national soccer team was still lame; (Ed: The Chinese are big soccer fans but, year after year, the national team’s performance in international competitions has disappointed them. On top of that, in recent years, many players have been involved in scandals.)
  • When old people fell, still no one dared to help them;
  • The high-speed train crash investigation yielded no result;
  • The “da Vinci” brand furniture that you wanted to buy turned out to be fake; (Ed: “da Vinci” was a hyped-up “super Italian” furniture brand in China that commanded sky-high prices. It was found to be a fake brand (not from Italy) and the materials used were of poor quality.
  • The Château Lafite Rothschild that you drank was created on a ship; (Ed: Suggesting it was not the real Château Lafite Rothschild from France, but fake.)
  • We were all good, just didn’t have a ticket to board (Noah’s Ark) (Ed: A reference to 2012 being the end of the world). …
***

  • High-speed trains in Wenzhou kissed each other,
  • Subways in Shanghai rear-ended,
  • A train in Beijing fell off the track,
  • A ship in Hunan sank into the river,
  • The FBC-1 (Flying Leopard) fighter jet crashed,
  • To protect the South China Sea territory, we can only use our mouths, (Ed: Hinting the government only talks instead of taking real action)
  • When they go to Thailand, humans become ghosts. (Ed: Referring to the 13 Chinese sailors who were murdered on the Mekong River in Thailand.
***

The differences between television and the computer (Ed: comparing the state-controlled media with the Internet):
When you turn on the computer, it seems that the society is so dark, officials are so corrupt, gangsters are on a rampage, people struggle to make ends meet, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will be destroyed immediately.
When you turn on the television, it seems that society is in such harmony, people are so happy, the whole country is full of peace and prosperity, and the CCP will stay in power for a hundred years without any problem.

The computer shows you a picture of real life,
Television shows you a picture of wedding portrait. (Ed: Implying the television has “make-up” on and is highly illusionary.)

***

In the great People’s Republic of China:
Gasoline? We can’t afford to fill our tanks.
Roads? We can’t afford to walk on them. (Ed: Many local governments collect tolls for use of the roads)
School? We can’t afford to go to them.
Sickness? We can’t afford to be treated.
An apartment? We can’t afford to buy one.
Cemetery? We can’t afford buy a plot, so we can’t afford to die.
Vegetables? We can’t afford to eat.
Debts? We can’t afford to pay them back.
Lawsuits? We can’t afford to take anyone to court.
Officials? We can’t afford to offend them.
Wedding? We can’t afford to have one.
Children? We can’t afford to raise them.
Love? We can’t risk being hurt.
Consciences? Sorry, we don’t have any.
The old person who falls? We don’t help.
The child crushed by a car? We don’t save.
In China, we are still alive. Isn’t that amazing??????

Thursday, October 14, 2010

End Censorship, say Elders


Bad times for the Party, after the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the moderate dissident Lui Xiaobo, 20 senior retired editors, journalists and Party officials  have written an open letter against the recurrent censorship orchestrated by the Propaganda (now known as Publicity) Department of the Party. 
Author and signatory Tie Liu explains that: "The press environment has deteriorated in recent decades." He gives the example of an article written by Li Rui, Mao's former secretary (no. 1 signatory of the petition), which could be published in 1981 but was just recently censored from a book.
There is no doubt that the situation is becoming worse and worse. Is there any other country in the world where the Prime Minister is systematically censored? India has of course no comment.


Open letter from ex party officials calls for end to media censorship in China
October 13, 2010
South China Morning Post
(By Staff Reporters in Beijing)
Ex-officials demand party grants freedom of speech
A group of former high-ranking political and cultural officials published a rare, strongly worded open letter to the top legislature calling mainland media censorship unconstitutional and saying it should be abolished.
They also demanded that media products and books from Hong Kong and Macau - popular among mainland readers - be made openly available on mainland newsstands and in bookstores.
The letter, published online, calls the lack of free speech, which is enshrined in the 1982 constitution, a "scandal of the world history of democracy". It even cites Hong Kong in the colonial era as an example of somewhere that enjoyed freedom of speech and publication.
In particular, the group of 23 well-known individuals condemned the Communist Party's central propaganda department as the "black hand" with a clandestine power to censor even Premier Wen Jiabao's repeated calls for political reform and to deprive the people their right to learn about it.
For the last few weeks, well-connected professionals in Beijing have been talking about the party propaganda authorities' almost open insult to the premier by deleting his points on political reform the day after he made his speech in Shenzhen.
Open letters of this kind rarely lead to any reform, but can land the authors in trouble with the authorities. However, in this case, the high profile of the signatories means they are unlikely to be punished.
The open letter coincided with the imprisoned dissident Liu Xiaobo's winning of the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday. But several initiators of it said the two events were unrelated; rather, the open letter had been initiated earlier than the announcement of the Nobel Peace Prize and was directly triggered by the injustice to Xie Chaoping , an investigative reporter.
In mid-August, Xie was taken from his home in Beijing by police from Shaanxi province, 1,000 kilometres away, under the charge of "illegal business operation". But Xie and his supporters believe the actual reason was the book that he had published about forced migration to make way for a water project and related official corruption. Xie was released after 30 days' detention for lack of evidence but still has to spend the next year "waiting for trial".
Among the leading sponsors are Li Rui , former secretary of Mao Zedong who was sacked after disagreeing with Mao's disastrous economic programme; and Hu Jiwei, former publisher of the party's mouthpiece the People's Daily, who was removed for trying to reflect the people's voices. Both men are in their 90s. Li confirmed that he had put his name on the open letter.
Zhong Peizhang , former news bureau chief of the Central Propaganda Department and another sponsor of the letter, said the petition was to fight for the rights of expression. He said the current press environment was unsatisfactory.
Author Tie Liu , another sponsor, said Xie Chaoping's case was a brilliant opportunity that the sponsors should grab. "These veteran media professionals have not been able to speak their minds for so long that they all felt bottled up and frustrated," Tie said. "The situation the press is in must change."
"The press environment has deteriorated in recent decades," said Tie, citing in the letter the example of Li Rui's article, which could be published in 1981 but was just recently censored from a book. "As the radio, TV, print media and the internet are all tightly controlled, people nowadays have no channels to file their petitions but sometimes have to turn to foreigners. This could lead to chaos and public disturbance."
He said he had received more than 500 signatures from people aged from their early 20s to 97. "All petition signatories used their real names, and 90 per cent of them are party members," Tie said.
Sha Yexin , author and former president of Shanghai People's Art Theatre, said freedoms of the press and expression were better for the party's governing in the long run if they were ensured. "Freedom of the press actually serves as a decompressor," Sha said, adding that the suppression of information and a totalitarian society were behind disasters such as the Cultural Revolution and the anti-rightist campaign.
Dai Qing , an author and activist, said even if there was a 0.001 percent chance the petition would lead to change then it must be done.
The open letter begins by citing article 35 of the Chinese Constitution (the 1982 edition) that all citizens have freedoms of speech, of publication, of assembly, of association and of demonstration. But it points out that for 28 years these constitutional rights have existed only in words but never really in practice.
Citing words by President Hu Jintao and Wen in support of freedom of speech, the open letter says the reality in today's China is worse than that of the former British colony of Hong Kong, where mainlanders can find many books on Chinese politics they can't find at home.
Sponsors of the open letter seemed most outraged by the fact that even Wen had been censored. They cited examples of his speech in Shenzhen on August 21, a talk with journalists in the US on September 22 and his speech to the United Nations General Assembly on September 23.
Wen talked about political reform on all those occasions, but it was not mentioned in reports by Xinhua.
"What right does the Central Propaganda Department have," the open letter asked, "to place itself even above the Communist Party Central Committee, and above the State Council?" Wen, as premier, heads the State Council - the executive branch of the state elected by the National People's Congress.
The letter calls on the NPC to enact a new law of news and publication to replace "the countless rules and regulations" that hamper freedoms of speech and publication.
Most importantly, it says the media should gain its "relative independence" from direct control by the party or state apparatus. It notes that the mainland's censorship system lags behind Britain by 315
years and France by 129 years.

The signatories to the letter include
1. Li Rui, former deputy head of the CCP Organisation Department/former
secretary for Mao Zedong
2. Hu Jiwei, former editor-in-chief of People's Daily
3. Yu You, former deputy editor-in-chief of China Daily
Li Pu, former vice-president of Xinhua News Agency
4. Zhong Peizhang, former chief of News Bureau of the CCP Central
Propaganda Department
5. Jiang Ping, former President of China University of Political Science and Law
6. Zhou Shaoming, former deputy director of political dept of Guangzhou
Military Command
7. Zhang Zhongpei, former head of Palace Museum; head of council of
Archaeological Society of China
8. Du Guang, professor of the Central Party School
9. Guo Daohui, former editor-in-chief, China Legal Science Magazine
10. Xiao Mo, former head of the Institute of Architectural Art of China Art Academy
11. Zhuang Puming, former vice-president, People's Publishing House
12. Hu Fuchen, former editor-in-chief, China Worker Publishing House
13. Zhang Ding, former president of Social Sciences Academic Press of
China Academy of Social Sciences
14. Ouyang Jin, editor-in-chief of Pacific Magazine in Hong Kong
15. Yu Haocheng, former president of Qunzhong Press
16. Zhang Qing, former president of China Film Publishing House
17. Yu Yueting, former president of Fujian TV station
18. Sha Yexin , former president, Shanghai People's Art Theatre, author
19. Sun Xupei, former president of Journalism Institute of China Academy
of Social Sciences
20. Xin Ziling, former director of Contemporary China Editorial Bureau
under the National Defence University
21. Tie Liu, editor of private publication The Past with Traces, author
22. Wang Yongcheng, professor of Shanghai Jiaotong University

Eight proposals for change that the letter seek are

1. Dismantle the system where media organisations are all tied to certain higher authorities.
2. Respect journalists and their due social status. Protection and support should be rendered to them when they are covering mass actions and exposing official corruption.
3. Revoke the ban on cross-provincial supervision by public opinion.
4. No Web administrator should be allowed to delete any items or post any of their own items at will, except for cases where the state information or citizens' privacy is truly affected. Abolish cyber-police and the "50-cent army" [paid favourable commentators].
5. Guarantee to all citizens the right to know the crimes and mistakes committed by the political party in power; there should be no areas in the Communist Party's history where recording and debate are forbidden.
6. Launch pilot projects, preferably in the magazines Southern Weekend and Yan Huang Chun Qiu, in the reform of developing media organisations owned by citizens. A democratic political system should not tolerate the party in power and the government squandering taxpayers' money on self-congratulation.
7. Allow media and publications from Hong Kong and Macau to be openly distributed.
8. Change the mission of propaganda authorities at all levels, from preventing the leak of information, to facilitating its accurate, timely and smooth spread; from assisting corrupt officials to censor investigative and critical articles, to supporting the media's supervision of the Communist Party and the government; from closing down publications, sacking editors-in-chief, and arresting journalists, to resisting political privilege and protecting media and
journalists.